In Curious? Discover the Missing Ingredient to a Fulfilling Life by Todd Kashdan, Ph.D. talks about the relationship between anxiety and curiosity using a metaphor of dials that can go from 0 to 10 like on a radio.
The anxiety knob is a sticky knob that you may have trouble moving. The more you try to calm down - turn the know down - the more it sticks or even goes up. But the other knob, which is labeled Explore can freely move all the way up and down the range of values. If you turn that Explore knob all the way up to 10, and interesting things happens to the Anxiety knob. It doesn’t immediately go down to zero but it sudden moves much more freely, sometimes high and sometimes low, but the point is that it can know move.
"It’s not that curious people are free from anxiety…. Instead of focusing on how much anxiety they feel, curious people benefit from what they do with their anxiety. Curious people act on their curiosity and explore whatever is intriguing them, taking those anxious feelings and any discomfort they bring along for the ride."
Image from Flickr
How are those slides coming?
Are you one of those people who needs to peek? You check the food in the oven, just to make sure. Maybe you don’t quite keep your fingers closed together when playing hide and seek? You just want to see what the slides will look like without all the PowerPoint interface in your way?
It’s OK to peek. I encourage it. Take a look at how the slides will look in Slide Show view. There are several ways to do it. You can use the Slide Show button. You can use keystrokes. Or you can even have a quarter screen preview sit on the side of the screen that you can scroll through independently of the working slides.
Sometimes the most important thing a person can do is to ask the right question and Work Smarter, Play Longer by Tara Ross is a small book that can unleash big insights for anyone willing to consider the 33 challenges and dozens of thought-provoking questions it contains. It begins with a dedication to those who asked “How do you do it all?” and follows up with the author’s answer. She shares how she does it all and offers practical examples and suggestions that any of us can examine and see how they fit into our view of having it all. The purpose of the book is to help us find more non-productive time which is different from some productivity books which seem to focus more on simply helping us to get more work done. Work Smarter, Play Longer is about balance and enjoying yourself, not just making sure the wheels spin faster and faster. The book is structured around four Ps that the author found helped her in “overcoming perfectionism, avoiding procrastination, establishing priorities and creating a life that was unique to my personality.”
For both perfectionism and procrastination is it vital to retain some balance. If your perfectionists tendencies leave your crippled at the slighted error or your procrastination serves as a way of beating yourself up for being lazy, then these negative cycles can leave you little time for anything other than self-loathing. That is not to say that you shouldn’t pay attention to the details. They are important to doing excellent work. Likewise, some procrastination can be good for you. Jumping at every email the second the notification arrives can result is extra work and loss of productivity as you flit from item to item and lose focus.
The second of the two Ps are equally important to consider. Without clear priorities you cannot create a path or goals which are crucial to efficiency. How can get somewhere if you don’t know where you are going. If you haven’t defined what success looks like, how will you recognize it? If we have a basic plan in place it is also easier to distinguish between opportunities and bright shiny distractions. The author tells a great story about applying to a program in school that at first appeared to be a distraction but when examined against her life map it turned out to match up and provide an excellent route to where she was headed. Notice I said where she was headed.
The final P of the book’s formula is personality. What worked for the author will not work in the same way for everyone. I found myself becoming sort of defensive as I read parts about hiring people to do certain chores to free up time for instance. Right now that would really not work for me but that’s fine. It worked for the author and it was a great nudge to me to remember that there are times when I could be better about delegating. Each of us has to find tools and techniques that work for us so we can create the life we want. As the book reminds us at the end:
“… the purpose of increasing productivity is to work smarter so you can play longer. Avoid creating a life of such efficiency and mechanization that you lose the joy of being spontaneous and creative.”
Years back I went to a wonderful show called Dave Gorman’s Googlewhack Adventure (which you can watch here). I’ll confess that as I started this year’s PowerPoint slide adventure of my own I had forgotten about how Dave Gorman uses PowerPoint in his shows. I blame him for not coming back to the U.S. more often. :)
Anyway, I came across a reference to his more recent shows, one of which is completely accurately and transparently called Dave Gorman’s PowerPoint Presentation and that led me to a video interview from which the image above was snagged. In that interview he shows that he gets PowerPoint in a way that many business people and academics don’t.
"Years ago when I was telling stories and I had to put the evidence in front of people PowerPoint became a really useful way of me doing it because I could put all of the evidence on the screen immediately for them and I have continued to use it for comedy because it allows me to put what I’m talking about right in front of people and get into the detail of it. Detail that you might not have collectively in your imagination already but we can all in the room be someplace at the same time and be thinking about the same thing. And having that kind of shared belief in something is kind of essential for comedy."
Simply replace the word comedy with communication and you’ll see why I captioned today’s slide the way I did.
Hmm, maybe when I have completed my 365 day project of slides I’ll take them on the road.
This weekend I have been reading Don’t Go Back to School: A Handbook for Learning Anything by Kio Stark. I’ll write more about the book later but one section got me thinking about how I would depict the text in a graphic. The point is that most people who set out to learn something on their own take one of two approaches: they want to gain a mastery of a specific field of knowledge or they have a specific project they want to achieve. It could be a combination. Likewise there are two types of paths that learners usually take, again, not completely mutually exclusive: a linear path or an associative path.
While the examples that I populated the matrix with were not all specifically mentioned in the book, I think it would help to make the picture complete. So, for example, someone setting out to develop a knowledge of art history might visit some websites and bounce around following a particular period or style of art that captures their attention, which a more linear person might find a syllabus online and follow a more structured path. Both have advantages and disadvantages, but the right answer depends upon the learner and his/her ultimate goals.
As far as the graphic goes, play with tables. Remember that with some merging of cells you let the table structure help you lay out the information in an orderly fashion and then format the table to make it look less, well, table like.
Today the challenge was to start coming up with ideas for a slide layout that could accommodate qr codes and a link to source material. Why both? Well some audience members will want to scan the codes because they are viewing the presentation live, while others will want to click the link since they will be viewing the slides online.
I’ve written before about my love/hate thing with qr codes and how they are often distracting and unattractive. I know that you can make them with image background and pretty them up, but that is not always feasible either. I could adjust the color of the code to better suit the presentation color scheme, which helps. But the bottom line is I wanted to find as unobtrusive a way as possible.
One option I came up with was to include a stripe down the right side with a subtle color that both sets the area off but doesn’t overwhelm the whole slide. Parking the code over there gives it a home. It can still affect the balance of the design of the rest of the slide but not horrible. Then adding a very thin strip along the bottom in black which will effectively float below the slide just shortens the usable slide area by a smidge. Again, not a horrible trade-off.
I’m still playing with it. So what options have you come up with to add the ability of audience members/viewers interacting with your slides in a presentation setting?
"Ninjas wear black and are trained to move slowly and smoothly because motion attracts attention." Lee Jackson in PowerPoint Surgery
There is good attention and bad attention. This isn’t like celebrity life where you just want to make sure they are talking about you. This is “real” life where you want people to get your message and focus on that and not the visual flares you can add to your slides. I am not against animating slides … as long as it serves a purpose, other than making them “more interesting” or “prettier.”
I know it is really tempting, particularly with new PowerPoint users to want to go for the flash. It’s fun. It makes them feel like they made PowerPoint really do something. Of course they are happy if their pen just writes for them. They don’t expect it to dance or sing. (Well, maybe some wish it would make them coffee.) The point it is that both the pen and PowerPoint are tools. If we want to write an interesting story we don’t think hey let me get a glitter pen and write it because then it will be more interesting.
Make your slides ninjas. Keep the motion to a minimum. As soon as something changes on the screen, your audience’s eyes and brains will go to the motion. Even if it is just momentarily. It is a moment you have lost their attention on you.
"There are three big things in life that we rarely get trained for — relationships, parenting and PowerPoint." This is a quote from Lee Jackson’s book PowerPoint Surgery: How to create presentation slides that make your message stick.
It is a no nonsense book that practices good presentation practices. It is short and to the point. It is personable and authentic. It respects the audience. It is a quick read during which I found myself thinking, hey, this is the kind of book I would write.
This book helps you take your slides’ temperature, and backed by both research and experience, it offers you suggestions for improving your slides. One of my favorite sections was about bullet points and boring slides. Jackson honestly spells our what most of us do and think about them. By bullet point three our attention has flipped over to our favorite mobile game, by four our eyes are getting heavy, by six we have lost “the will to live,” and by the eighth slide we have forgotten our names and are practically in the fetal position.
My diagnosis is acute accuracy with equal parts humor and helpfulness. If you follow his prescription your audience will soon be feeling better.
Busy day today at work but I’m still finding time to work on my conference presentation on PLEs. I’ve received several questions recently about what PLEs are. Well, there’s the rub. There’s not a consensus on that but basically it means Personal Learning Environment. Some think it is a system, some focus more on the technologies, some on the concept, some are academic in their approach and others more concerned with applied usage.
For my presentation I’ll be focusing on the idea that your PLE is the sum total of people, places, and technologies that you use for learning. By being aware of our environment we can be purposeful and leverage it to its fullest. I think it solves two issues in particular: how do we stay current in our professions, and how do we filter the massive amounts of information available.
This could be even more important as the number of Millennials in the workforce increases. I heard one interviewed recently who said that one reason that his generation have to change jobs so frequently is to be able to amass the skills they really need for their professions. It’s not possible for any academic institution to teach them all the skills they need, and it is not possible that training departments in the workplace can keep up with the rapidity of change. But we could have a dual educational track that melds the formal and the PLE. More on that thought soon.
But in the meantime, PLE could also mean People Learn Everywhere. Mobile learning is not just a trendy idea, it is the reality for many learners. Cell phones literally open up a world of learning for many less developed nations.
Or it could mean Passion Leads Everyone. You don’t have to convince a kid who loves video games to play them, or an artist to draw. People will seek out learning about things they need or want to know, but they don’t always know the best way to go about finding the information. They may not have learned how to learn, or how they learn best. Once they do that we could say that Purpose Leverages Enthusiasm. Or so my thoughts are forming.
This is both a reminder of the importance of proofreading and the spirit of the process. Every word on the slide above is spelled correctly but the slide certainly points out an error. This is why we can’t just rely on things like the magical red squiggly line beneath words that our text editors suggests are misspelled when we proofread. Prince Harry may very well long to be supreme over the kings of the oceans and want to crown himself the new Poseidon, but for now he is Prince of a geographical location and not of the sea creatures.
The image of Prince Harry was found here.